🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of randomization during my D&D sessions. I tended was for story direction and session development to be guided by deliberate decisions as opposed to pure luck. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Watching a Custom Mechanic

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who regularly asks for "chance rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by choosing a specific dice and defining consequences based on the roll. While it's fundamentally no different from using a random table, these get invented on the spot when a player's action has no obvious resolution.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, mostly because it seemed novel and offered a departure from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing balance between planning and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable In-Game Example

At a session, my group had concluded a large-scale battle. Later, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. Instead of picking a fate, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both died; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they survived.

The die came up a 4. This led to a profoundly emotional sequence where the adventurers came upon the remains of their companions, forever holding hands in death. The group held a ceremony, which was particularly meaningful due to previous character interactions. As a final touch, I decided that the forms were miraculously transformed, showing a spell-storing object. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the party needed to address another major quest obstacle. One just script this type of perfect story beats.

Sharpening Your Improvisation

This event led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are actually the core of D&D. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players often excel at derailing the most detailed plans. Therefore, a good DM must be able to pivot effectively and fabricate scenarios on the fly.

Using luck rolls is a excellent way to train these skills without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The strategy is to use them for low-stakes decisions that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. As an example, I would not employ it to determine if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I could use it to determine if the party enter a room just in time to see a major incident occurs.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

This technique also serves to maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the story is dynamic, shaping according to their choices immediately. It combats the sense that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby strengthening the cooperative foundation of storytelling.

This approach has historically been integral to the original design. Original D&D were filled with encounter generators, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Although modern D&D often focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with thorough preparation. But, equally valid no problem with letting go and allowing the dice to guide minor details instead of you. Control is a major part of a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so might improve the game.

A piece of suggestion is this: Have no fear of temporarily losing control. Experiment with a little randomness for minor outcomes. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is far more powerful than anything you could have pre-written by yourself.